tisdag 28 augusti 2007
Helylle-vitingen
Jag älskar verkligen Steve Nash och han verkar vara en av de bästa människorna i hela världen alla kategorier. Dock borde han verkligen 1) snyta sig och 2) sluta lyssna på sina italienska fotbollspolare när det kommer till att klä sig.
Alibi-vitingen
Medan det amerikanska basketlandslaget går från klarhet till klarhet i sitt nystartade återtåg till toppen av FIBA-basketen, de har verkligen krossat allt motstånd hittills i FIBA Amercas även om den senaste 27-poängsvinsten mot Mexico blottade några av Team USA:s svagheter (jävlar vad jag gillar att de amerikanska kommentatorerna hela tiden i alla sportsammanhang alltid säger Team USA, Team Canada, Team Sweden osv.), så är det en liten grej jag undrar över. Vad i hela Hälsingland gör Mike Miller i laget?
Miller ska, tillsammans med Michael Redd, stå för trepoängsskyttet mot eventuella europeiska zon-försvar - är det tänkt i alla fall. Miller återfinns dock först på 55:e plats i turneringen när det gäller trepoängsskyttet procentmässigt, vilket till exempel är hela 8 platser efter Canadas och tillika Philadelphia 76s center Samuel Dalembert. Inte vidare värst bra alltså. Snarare värst.
Nu är detta i och för sig lite missvisande eftersom det inte finns något krav över hur många försök man minst ska ha gett sig på vilket betyder att några okända turknuttar som satt ett skott på ett försök leder, men ändå.
Om man ser bara till de amerikanska spelarna så ligger den så kallade trepoängsspecialisten Miller efter i tur-och-ordning: Jason Kidd, Lebron James, Carmelo Anthony, Kobe Bryant, Deron Williams, Michael Redd och Chauncey Billups - det vill säga nästan varenda amerikan som ens försökt sig på en trepoängare i turneringen.
Vad har då Miller där att göra när han uppenbarligen inte är något vidare på att skjuta långskott? Kan han dribbla? NEJ. Passa? NEJ. Spela försvar? HELL NO. Med andra ord skulle de egentligen lika gärna kunnat ta med lillkillen Adam Morrison så han får se och lära inför OS 2020.
För både Mike och Adam har något som ingen annan i laget har - vitt skinn (eller snarare någon slags skär nyans men whatever). Och om Team USA (där är det igen!) nu verkligen var tvugna att ta med en alibi-viting så förstår jag verkligen inte varför de valde Miller framför vår synske kamrat Kirk.
Fast helst av allt skulle jag vilja se mister Miller ersatt av Mighty 0.
onsdag 8 augusti 2007
Global fussball ok
Steve Nash, som spenderar sina somrar boendes på Manhattan, är ju som bekant väldigt fotbollsintresserad (om du inte är bekanta med detta faktum kan du inte vara särdeles intresserade av basket, eller också är du helt enkelt bara sär). Nash spelar offensiv mittfältare i något slags halv-korpen/halvseriöst lag beståendes av han själv och massa italienare. För några dagar sedan spelade de en vänskapsmatch i Central Park mot New York Red Bulls, det stora äpplets professionella fotbollslag.
Ändå sjukt roligt hur stor Nash ser ut i jämförelse med fotbollsdudesen.
tisdag 7 augusti 2007
söndag 5 augusti 2007
Power struggle
Sommaren har ju inte bara bjudit på en strid ström av Gud faders tårar över vårat gudsförgätna land, utan även på en spelarström från väst till öst av tidigare oskådat slag. Har Garnetts, Allens, Randolphs, med fleras adressändringar förändrat maktbalansen eller är Western Conference fortfarande herre på täppan? Det har som sagt bjudits på mer eller mindre banbrytande och ögonbrynshöjande byten och kontrakteranden den senaste tiden. Jason Richardson till Charlotte, Randolph till New York, Lewis till Orlando och sen har vi ju sist men inte minst blockbusterbytena Allen och Garnett till Boston. Alla fem spelare med mer eller mindre superstjärnestatus som gått från väst till öst, utan att väst egentligen har fått mycket mer än några lovande kids och ekonomisk lättnad i utbyte.
Det är inte bara jag och David Stern som nu hoppas på en jämnare liga den kommande säsongen så låt oss gå igenom några av de största spelarförflyttningarna och se hur, och om, detta kommer kunna förändra förra säsongens totala dominans från Western Conference.
Ray Allen och Kevin Garnett till Boston.
Boston har de senaste säsongerna varit en blek kopia av en blek kopia av sitt gamla jag. De missade de senaste två slutspelen och åkte ut i första rundan två år i rad före det. Något var helt enkelt tvunget att hända, och nog hände det något allt!
Först kontrakterades skarpskjutaren Ray Allen från Seattle Supersonics i slutet på juni och efter det, nästan på dagen en månad senare, släpptes en rekryteringsbomb av atom-kaliber, nämligen Kevin Garnett. Den stora biljetten lämnar så äntligen sitt hopplösa Minnesota och kommer tillsammans med Allen och Paul Pierce bilda ett av de mest fruktade "triple threats" i hela ligan den kommande säsongen.
Många, inklusive undertecknad, blev så till sig av Garnett-bytet att vi genast gav Boston Eastern Conference-titeln redan innan KG hade fått på sig sitt Cetics-linne på presskonferensen. Nu såhär i efterhand när den första adrenalinkicken har dippat är jag dock inte så säker. Precis som alla andra redan har sagt har Celtics en oerhört sårbar bänk, men deras tre stjärnor kommer ändå garantera de en slutspelsplats nästa säsong. Någon NBA-final blir det dock inte förrän tidigast nästa säsong och i kamp mot Western-lagen har de nog inte så mycket att säga till om.
Randolph till New York.
Om Celtics har haft det lite motigt den senaste tiden är det dock ingenting jämfört med Knickerbockarna från det stora äpplet. Trots att de betalat, och betalar, ut mer lön än något annat NBA-lag har de inte varit i slutspel sedan 2001.
För att ändra på detta har de nu gjort sig av med Steve Francis, som ju i princip hade exakt samma spelstil och position som deras stjärna Stephon Marbury, och värvat Zach Randolph, som i princip har exakt samma spelstil och position som deras andra stjärna Eddy Curry.
Tror verkligen inte att Knicks har den minst chans på final, eller ens att ta sig förbi en mycket eventuell förstarunda. Hell, om de ens går till slutspel borde den annars så hånade Isiah Thomas utnämnas till "coach of the year". Detta kommer alltså inte heller vara något större hot mot Wests dominans.
Jason Richardson till Charlotte.
Charlotte har aldrig spelat i ett slutspel men har å andra sidan bara funnits till sedan 2004. Med Jason Richardson och Gerald Wallace springandes i korridorerna kan de nog skada vilket lag som helst den kommande säsongen beroende på dagsform. De är ett av lagen som slåss om den sista slutspelsplatsen (efter Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Miami, Toronto och Washington, fast där jag är lite tveksam över Miami och deras skadeproblem) men något hot mot väst kommer de inte utgöra.
Enda påverkan det här bytet gör är att det möjligen kommer försvaga de fantastiska Golden State Warriors som förra säsongen bjöd på den mest underhållande basketen i mannaminne.
Rashard Lewis till Orlando.
Orlando tog sig turligt till slutspel förra säsongen efter att ett flertal rivaler drabbades av skador på framstående spelare i slutspurten. Lewis kommer tillsammans med Dwight Howard bilda en giftig duo men får nog sälla sig till de 5-6 lag som slåss om de 1,5 sista slutspelsplatserna (där Miami som sagt har en halv plats nu och kommer få den andra halvan om de lyckas hålla sig hela och rena).
Inget nämnvärt hot här heller alltså.
Slutsats.
Det ser alltså ut som att NBA anno 2007/08 kommer bli ungefär som förra säsongen där endast 2-3 lag från Eastern Conference kommer kunna mäta sig med sina rivaler i väst. Största balansrubbningen kommer ske inom deras egen Conference där fler lag än tidigare ser slutspelskapabla ut.
Ett litet utropstecken måste dock tilldelas Chicago Bulls som i det tysta byggt vidare runt sin unga stomme och värvat Joe Smith och nästansvensken Joakim Noah. Om jag skulle vara tvungen att nu satsa mina sista penningar, alltså ungefär £25, på vilket lag som representerar öst i finalen nästa sommar skulle min röst gå till Bulls.
Men om man tänker på att Suns och Dallas kommer vara minst lika bra som förra året, Denver kommer få tillbaka All-Starspelaren Kenyon Martin, Memphis bytt tränare samt värvat en stor center (Darko!) plus en riktigt bra, om än ung, point guard (Conley jr.), Portlands och Seattles nya unga garden som förhoppningsvist kommer leda till förbättrade resultat (även om de förmodligen inte kommer gå till slutspel) och tänk sedan slutligen på Houston som förbättrats mest av alla under sommaren ser den kommande säsongen inte alltför ljus ut ur en ostlig synvinkel.
onsdag 1 augusti 2007
Hoop Dreams goes ESPN
ESPN hörde sig för hos sina skribenter angående ifall den stora spelarflykten från West till East (Garnett, Allen, Lewis, Randolph) har lett till en förskjuten maktbalans i ligan. Självklart hörde de även av sig till mig för ytterligare ett expertutlåtande:
Writer roundup: Has the balance of power shifted in the East?
Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen in Boston. Zach Randolph in New York. Rashard Lewis in Orlando. Say what you want about the weak Eastern Conference, but it has definitely improved this summer. So, has the balance of power shifted in the East? Our experts chime in with their early thoughts:
1. Does the addition of KG and Ray Allen make the Celtics a postseason lock?
Henry Abbott, TrueHoop: Yes, which is really just a comment on the weak Eastern Conference. Rajon Rondo might prove me wrong, but I think they're a bona fide point guard away from being a truly important team. I assume Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Cleveland, Miami, Toronto, and probably New Jersey will make the postseason, barring injury or unpredictable bizarreness.
John Hollinger, ESPN.com: I hesitate to use the word "lock" because injuries can ravage almost any team out of the blue, especially one as thin as the Celts. But under reasonable scenarios, yes, they're a lock.
Marc Stein, ESPN.com: C'mon. They're a lock for 50-plus wins and my favorites to win the East. I know a lot of folks are comparing this trio to the ill-fated Atlanta triumvirate in the late 1980s (Dominique Wilkins, Moses Malone and Reggie Theus) or Hakeem Olajuwon, Charles Barkley and Scottie Pippen in Houston. But those comparisons overlook the fact that the East of today is insanely weak.
David Thorpe, Scouts Inc.: Lock? No, they are now so thin that any injury to one of the big three spells doom. It is more than likely that they make it in, but far from definite unless a few more additions are made.
Ric Bucher, ESPN The Magazine: In a conference where one All-Star can get you to the Finals, having 2 1/2 certainly assures a playoff berth and a shot at the Finals.
Moses Blackman, Hoop Dreams: Mos def. Even if one of the big guns would get their powder wet they still have enough muscle to get to the playoffs. Especially now when they have added Eddie House to the mix.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Any particular player(s) you think the Celtics should target to fill the roster?
Abbott: It's tough because they are over the cap, can't be in the mood to move a lot of draft picks, and need someone who is ready to win now. They'll have to gamble on someone else's rejects. I'm sure they're looking at all kinds of free agents who have been playing in Europe, the CBA and the D-League.
Hollinger: Wang Zhizhi. Don't laugh. The C's need minimum wage guys who can make open shots. Wang has shot 38.5 percent on 3s for his career and averages nearly a point every two minutes. I really don't understand why he's not in the NBA, and he'd be perfect on this team.
Stein: Everything I'm hearing suggests that the Celtics are targeting only minimum-salary guys at this stage because KG, Allen and Pierce will cost more than $56 million alone. So they probably can't get Brevin Knight or any of the top remaining free agents.
Thorpe: I like Sarunas Jasikevicius from a personnel standpoint. He is a born leader who excels at passing and shooting (and winning).
Bucher: It's a little late in the game for finding a veteran point guard, which they desperately need, but both Austin Croshere and P.J. Brown would help fill out the front line and can contribute without needing touches -- which will be in short supply.
Blackman: With the addition of House they don't have that much cash to splash but P.J. Brown would be a good fella to have on their bench.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Does the addition of Zach Randolph make the Knicks a postseason lock?
Abbott: If I'm right that Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Cleveland, Miami, Toronto, and probably New Jersey will make the playoffs, then there's one spot left. The Knicks may well take it, but they're not a lock for anything. Practically every player on the roster needs the ball to be effective. I hope it'll work out, but I wouldn't count on it. And they'll have to beat out Orlando, Washington, Philadelphia and everyone else.
Hollinger: Not with that defense, no. The only lock here is that the Knicks will be a bottom-five defensive team with that Curry/Randolph frontcourt. Maybe they sneak in and maybe they don't.
Stein: Even though I thought trading for Zach was a worthy risk for Isiah Thomas, I have to see how Randolph and Eddy Curry co-exist before I buy all the way in. I know Zach can step out and hit jumpers, but there are some questions there.
Thorpe: No. We still need to see how Eddy Curry does when the offense does not revolve around him. And they will struggle to defend people inside. Toronto, Orlando, New Jersey, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and Boston are all better on paper, leaving just one spot. And Charlotte plus the Hawks will be improved, too.
Bucher: It makes them a lock for the most volatile chemistry experiment, on and off the court. I'm most interested to see how the league determines who to suspend if an altercation occurs between teammates and someone leaves the bench area.
Blackman: It's all about the chemistry, innit. Hopefully they sort things out and get to the playoffs, 'cause i would really like to see them there. And if lil Neezy's form from summer league continues, Crawford gets fit and Curry and Randolph can somehow defend the paint a bit, they've got a chance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Does the addition of Rashard Lewis make the Magic a postseason lock?
Abbott: Like Boston, I feel the Magic need a top-flight point guard before they can be considered a reliable top Eastern team. And again, I'm feeling that barring a surprise there aren't a lot of Eastern spots up for grabs.
Hollinger: Again, not so fast. The Magic lost nearly as much as they gained between Hill, Darko and Diener, and their neighborhood just got tougher.
Stein: A lock, yes. Just because Lewis is way -- W-A-Y -- overpaid doesn't mean I don't like the idea of pairing Rashard with Dwight Howard.
Thorpe: Barring injury, probably yes. Especially with the new coach. They can play big or small effectively, and Dwight Howard should only keep growing as a player. Jameer Nelson is obviously a key, as is getting production from J.J. Redick. I like both to have better seasons this year.
Bucher: No lock, but I like their chances, as much because they hired Stan Van Gundy as having added Lewis to a team that squeaked into the playoffs last year. Boston is the only certifiable lottery team from last year joining the playoff mix and with the Wizards still a mixed bag and huge question marks about Miami, the Magic have as good a shot as they did last year. Which was good enough.
Blackman: Hell no. They only made it to the playoffs last year because New York, Milwaukee, Charlotte and pretty much every other team that fell short were struck by injuries. They do got a itsy-bitsy-teenie-weenie chance to make it though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Besides the Celtics, which '07 East lottery team has the best shot of making the playoffs next season?
Abbott: New York is a big possibility, but I wouldn't count out the Sixers. Mismanaged as they may be, they have Andre Miller, and he's really something.
Hollinger: Don't sleep on Charlotte. They were wracked by injuries last season and still won 33 games; with the addition of Jason Richardson to the Wallace-Okafor-May-Felton nucleus, they could break into the top eight.
Stein: New York has upgraded and so has plucky Charlotte. Milwaukee, if healthy, will be in the mix for No. 8, too. The hard part is coming up with teams to bounce out of last season's top eight.
Thorpe: I like Charlotte. Richardson and Wallace on the wings is a great combination, and I think Felton is ready to make serious strides. If May can stay healthy then their chances are solid.
Bucher: Atlanta makes the most sense on paper, but until its ownership situation is cleared up, it's Philadelphia. They were a .500 team after the Iverson trade and .500 is good enough to make the playoffs in the East. Late-season performances by teams whose fate is sealed can be wildly misleading, but I like their chemistry and how their talent meshes more than I like the Knicks'.
Blackman: Charlotte. My man J-Rich has pushed my man Disco Thunder Dunk back to the bench, from wich he can come in and score without any pressure. That and, a hopefully fit, Sean May will give them a chance to get to the playoffs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. If the Celtics make the playoffs, which '07 East playoff team most likely will not make the playoffs next season?
Abbott: Gilbert Arenas could be the guy left standing at the altar, which would be especially troublesome for the Wizards, as he will be heading into free agency.
Hollinger: One of the Florida teams. Be great to see Stan Van Gundy and Pat Riley slugging it out for the 8 seed on the last day of the season; let's hope the schedule-makers come through.
Stein: The team that's about to be wracked with injuries but doesn't know it yet.
Thorpe: The Heat are in trouble. Ironically, they are beginning to look like the South Beach Lakers with maybe the best all-around player on the planet in Dwyane Wade, and little else beyond a few solid role players. It's no longer a question of "if Shaq can stay healthy," but "how many games will he miss?" Even if Wade can stay healthy all season, it may not be enough.
Bucher: Miami. It's hard to imagine Shaq and a healthy Wade not in the playoffs, but Shaq couldn't prevent a first-round sweep or attract any quality free agents and Wade's return is up in the air. And if it comes down to a battle between Orlando and Miami, I like the karmic and revenge-inspired motivation SVG brings to the table.
Blackman: Orlando. I think Rashard Lewis needs a season to settle in, and as i said earlier they were just lucky to get to the playoffs this season.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Which East team will have the best-regular season record?
Abbott: I'll guess Chicago, because they play hard, effective defense and have great young players coming into their prime.
Hollinger: I'll go with Chicago by a nose over Cleveland and Detroit right now, although with the caveat that I haven't done all my prognostication homework yet.
Stein: Cleveland and Chicago will be a year older and thus theoretically more consistent during the regular season. I see Detroit as a bit of a sleeper because the Pistons' kids (Jason Maxiell, Rodney Stuckey, Amir Johnson and Cheikh Samb) are underrated and will pump some life into a team that still has a strong core. But I can't deny it: I've got Celtics Fever.
Thorpe: The Bulls should hit the ground running and will be a solid threat to be the East's best team. Luol Deng has jumped up to a new level, and the addition of an energetic Joakim Noah should help the bench.
Bucher: Cavs. Getting to the Finals is an intangible boost to a team's ability to execute under pressure during the regular season. That has to be worth four wins even if LeBron the Entertainer has another slow start. Darkhorse: Toronto.
Blackman: Chicago. They're the new Detroit and we all know how the last couple of regular seasons ended for those guys. And Scott Skiles will get his men to fight for every game as it would be their last one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Which team will represent the East in the NBA Finals?
Abbott: I'd rather pick this in a few months when we see the rosters settle down, but I'd guess the Bulls. They have been playing together for awhile, they are built for the playoffs, they got a taste of success last year and want more. ... Plus, I'm a big fan of Luol Deng. I think he's only going to get better, and could become the reliable scorer they have lacked.
Hollinger: As much as I'd love to spend a week in Boston in June, I'm not banking on it. Chicago and Cleveland are deeper and defend better, and that will put one of them over the top.
Stein: There are probably 12 or 13 teams that have legit playoff aspirations in the conference, but my fever is such that I just don't think KG, Allen and Pierce need a lot around them to get to the Finals in this East. As LeBron James just proved.
Thorpe: At this point, I like Chicago. Had Detroit not peaked against them and knocked them out, the Bulls could have made the Finals last season. That experience, along with the improved play of Tyrus Thomas and the emergence of a superstar in Deng should add up to home-court advantage throughout the Eastern playoffs and a Finals appearance.
Bucher: Seeing as every team still has the same flaws it had last season, the Cavs are the easy answer -- except that last year's red-carpet path can't possibly be duplicated. If recent history has taught us anything, it is to expect the unexpected from the East, so I'll go with my darkhorse: Toronto.
Blackman: I'll go with Toronto. Chicago will win the regular season a few games ahead of Detroit and Cleveland but Toronto is gonna be better come playoffs. Bargnani and all the other youngins are gonna be smoking hot the next season and Raptors got one of the more versatile rosters in the East.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Has the balance of power in the NBA shifted East?
Abbott: No. The teams that are a threat to win the title are still concentrated in the West. If Miami figures out a post-Shaq plan that could change things, and Chicago likely will win a title at some point. Toronto is on the right track. But whatever greatness is in Detroit and Boston now won't be around all that long, and at some point the Greg Oden and Kevin Durant effect will kick in. Not to mention, I think the biggest reason the West has been strong is that they have some well-run teams, and that's not changing.
Hollinger: Good heavens, no. Forget the Spurs, Mavs and Suns -- find me a team in the East that could even beat Utah. The best team in that conference is still a No. 7 seed out West.
Stein: Let's not start with the balance-of-power questions. The West is still best by a fair distance. But the East desperately -- desperately -- needed a player of Garnett's stature to switch conferences. Allen, Rashard Lewis, Zach Randolph ... they all help, too.
Thorpe: Not at all. The West's Final 4 from last season would all be favorites to win the East. And I'll take Portland's and Seattle's future over almost any Eastern team.
Bucher: No and No.
Blackman: Are you kidding me? The West is, and will be a zillion times better than the East at least for another 10 years. The only thing that could possibly change that in the near future is if half of the Western Conference players gets AIDS or Ebola. Even then it would be a close call.
Writer roundup: Has the balance of power shifted in the East?
Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen in Boston. Zach Randolph in New York. Rashard Lewis in Orlando. Say what you want about the weak Eastern Conference, but it has definitely improved this summer. So, has the balance of power shifted in the East? Our experts chime in with their early thoughts:
1. Does the addition of KG and Ray Allen make the Celtics a postseason lock?
Henry Abbott, TrueHoop: Yes, which is really just a comment on the weak Eastern Conference. Rajon Rondo might prove me wrong, but I think they're a bona fide point guard away from being a truly important team. I assume Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Cleveland, Miami, Toronto, and probably New Jersey will make the postseason, barring injury or unpredictable bizarreness.
John Hollinger, ESPN.com: I hesitate to use the word "lock" because injuries can ravage almost any team out of the blue, especially one as thin as the Celts. But under reasonable scenarios, yes, they're a lock.
Marc Stein, ESPN.com: C'mon. They're a lock for 50-plus wins and my favorites to win the East. I know a lot of folks are comparing this trio to the ill-fated Atlanta triumvirate in the late 1980s (Dominique Wilkins, Moses Malone and Reggie Theus) or Hakeem Olajuwon, Charles Barkley and Scottie Pippen in Houston. But those comparisons overlook the fact that the East of today is insanely weak.
David Thorpe, Scouts Inc.: Lock? No, they are now so thin that any injury to one of the big three spells doom. It is more than likely that they make it in, but far from definite unless a few more additions are made.
Ric Bucher, ESPN The Magazine: In a conference where one All-Star can get you to the Finals, having 2 1/2 certainly assures a playoff berth and a shot at the Finals.
Moses Blackman, Hoop Dreams: Mos def. Even if one of the big guns would get their powder wet they still have enough muscle to get to the playoffs. Especially now when they have added Eddie House to the mix.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Any particular player(s) you think the Celtics should target to fill the roster?
Abbott: It's tough because they are over the cap, can't be in the mood to move a lot of draft picks, and need someone who is ready to win now. They'll have to gamble on someone else's rejects. I'm sure they're looking at all kinds of free agents who have been playing in Europe, the CBA and the D-League.
Hollinger: Wang Zhizhi. Don't laugh. The C's need minimum wage guys who can make open shots. Wang has shot 38.5 percent on 3s for his career and averages nearly a point every two minutes. I really don't understand why he's not in the NBA, and he'd be perfect on this team.
Stein: Everything I'm hearing suggests that the Celtics are targeting only minimum-salary guys at this stage because KG, Allen and Pierce will cost more than $56 million alone. So they probably can't get Brevin Knight or any of the top remaining free agents.
Thorpe: I like Sarunas Jasikevicius from a personnel standpoint. He is a born leader who excels at passing and shooting (and winning).
Bucher: It's a little late in the game for finding a veteran point guard, which they desperately need, but both Austin Croshere and P.J. Brown would help fill out the front line and can contribute without needing touches -- which will be in short supply.
Blackman: With the addition of House they don't have that much cash to splash but P.J. Brown would be a good fella to have on their bench.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Does the addition of Zach Randolph make the Knicks a postseason lock?
Abbott: If I'm right that Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Cleveland, Miami, Toronto, and probably New Jersey will make the playoffs, then there's one spot left. The Knicks may well take it, but they're not a lock for anything. Practically every player on the roster needs the ball to be effective. I hope it'll work out, but I wouldn't count on it. And they'll have to beat out Orlando, Washington, Philadelphia and everyone else.
Hollinger: Not with that defense, no. The only lock here is that the Knicks will be a bottom-five defensive team with that Curry/Randolph frontcourt. Maybe they sneak in and maybe they don't.
Stein: Even though I thought trading for Zach was a worthy risk for Isiah Thomas, I have to see how Randolph and Eddy Curry co-exist before I buy all the way in. I know Zach can step out and hit jumpers, but there are some questions there.
Thorpe: No. We still need to see how Eddy Curry does when the offense does not revolve around him. And they will struggle to defend people inside. Toronto, Orlando, New Jersey, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and Boston are all better on paper, leaving just one spot. And Charlotte plus the Hawks will be improved, too.
Bucher: It makes them a lock for the most volatile chemistry experiment, on and off the court. I'm most interested to see how the league determines who to suspend if an altercation occurs between teammates and someone leaves the bench area.
Blackman: It's all about the chemistry, innit. Hopefully they sort things out and get to the playoffs, 'cause i would really like to see them there. And if lil Neezy's form from summer league continues, Crawford gets fit and Curry and Randolph can somehow defend the paint a bit, they've got a chance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Does the addition of Rashard Lewis make the Magic a postseason lock?
Abbott: Like Boston, I feel the Magic need a top-flight point guard before they can be considered a reliable top Eastern team. And again, I'm feeling that barring a surprise there aren't a lot of Eastern spots up for grabs.
Hollinger: Again, not so fast. The Magic lost nearly as much as they gained between Hill, Darko and Diener, and their neighborhood just got tougher.
Stein: A lock, yes. Just because Lewis is way -- W-A-Y -- overpaid doesn't mean I don't like the idea of pairing Rashard with Dwight Howard.
Thorpe: Barring injury, probably yes. Especially with the new coach. They can play big or small effectively, and Dwight Howard should only keep growing as a player. Jameer Nelson is obviously a key, as is getting production from J.J. Redick. I like both to have better seasons this year.
Bucher: No lock, but I like their chances, as much because they hired Stan Van Gundy as having added Lewis to a team that squeaked into the playoffs last year. Boston is the only certifiable lottery team from last year joining the playoff mix and with the Wizards still a mixed bag and huge question marks about Miami, the Magic have as good a shot as they did last year. Which was good enough.
Blackman: Hell no. They only made it to the playoffs last year because New York, Milwaukee, Charlotte and pretty much every other team that fell short were struck by injuries. They do got a itsy-bitsy-teenie-weenie chance to make it though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Besides the Celtics, which '07 East lottery team has the best shot of making the playoffs next season?
Abbott: New York is a big possibility, but I wouldn't count out the Sixers. Mismanaged as they may be, they have Andre Miller, and he's really something.
Hollinger: Don't sleep on Charlotte. They were wracked by injuries last season and still won 33 games; with the addition of Jason Richardson to the Wallace-Okafor-May-Felton nucleus, they could break into the top eight.
Stein: New York has upgraded and so has plucky Charlotte. Milwaukee, if healthy, will be in the mix for No. 8, too. The hard part is coming up with teams to bounce out of last season's top eight.
Thorpe: I like Charlotte. Richardson and Wallace on the wings is a great combination, and I think Felton is ready to make serious strides. If May can stay healthy then their chances are solid.
Bucher: Atlanta makes the most sense on paper, but until its ownership situation is cleared up, it's Philadelphia. They were a .500 team after the Iverson trade and .500 is good enough to make the playoffs in the East. Late-season performances by teams whose fate is sealed can be wildly misleading, but I like their chemistry and how their talent meshes more than I like the Knicks'.
Blackman: Charlotte. My man J-Rich has pushed my man Disco Thunder Dunk back to the bench, from wich he can come in and score without any pressure. That and, a hopefully fit, Sean May will give them a chance to get to the playoffs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. If the Celtics make the playoffs, which '07 East playoff team most likely will not make the playoffs next season?
Abbott: Gilbert Arenas could be the guy left standing at the altar, which would be especially troublesome for the Wizards, as he will be heading into free agency.
Hollinger: One of the Florida teams. Be great to see Stan Van Gundy and Pat Riley slugging it out for the 8 seed on the last day of the season; let's hope the schedule-makers come through.
Stein: The team that's about to be wracked with injuries but doesn't know it yet.
Thorpe: The Heat are in trouble. Ironically, they are beginning to look like the South Beach Lakers with maybe the best all-around player on the planet in Dwyane Wade, and little else beyond a few solid role players. It's no longer a question of "if Shaq can stay healthy," but "how many games will he miss?" Even if Wade can stay healthy all season, it may not be enough.
Bucher: Miami. It's hard to imagine Shaq and a healthy Wade not in the playoffs, but Shaq couldn't prevent a first-round sweep or attract any quality free agents and Wade's return is up in the air. And if it comes down to a battle between Orlando and Miami, I like the karmic and revenge-inspired motivation SVG brings to the table.
Blackman: Orlando. I think Rashard Lewis needs a season to settle in, and as i said earlier they were just lucky to get to the playoffs this season.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Which East team will have the best-regular season record?
Abbott: I'll guess Chicago, because they play hard, effective defense and have great young players coming into their prime.
Hollinger: I'll go with Chicago by a nose over Cleveland and Detroit right now, although with the caveat that I haven't done all my prognostication homework yet.
Stein: Cleveland and Chicago will be a year older and thus theoretically more consistent during the regular season. I see Detroit as a bit of a sleeper because the Pistons' kids (Jason Maxiell, Rodney Stuckey, Amir Johnson and Cheikh Samb) are underrated and will pump some life into a team that still has a strong core. But I can't deny it: I've got Celtics Fever.
Thorpe: The Bulls should hit the ground running and will be a solid threat to be the East's best team. Luol Deng has jumped up to a new level, and the addition of an energetic Joakim Noah should help the bench.
Bucher: Cavs. Getting to the Finals is an intangible boost to a team's ability to execute under pressure during the regular season. That has to be worth four wins even if LeBron the Entertainer has another slow start. Darkhorse: Toronto.
Blackman: Chicago. They're the new Detroit and we all know how the last couple of regular seasons ended for those guys. And Scott Skiles will get his men to fight for every game as it would be their last one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Which team will represent the East in the NBA Finals?
Abbott: I'd rather pick this in a few months when we see the rosters settle down, but I'd guess the Bulls. They have been playing together for awhile, they are built for the playoffs, they got a taste of success last year and want more. ... Plus, I'm a big fan of Luol Deng. I think he's only going to get better, and could become the reliable scorer they have lacked.
Hollinger: As much as I'd love to spend a week in Boston in June, I'm not banking on it. Chicago and Cleveland are deeper and defend better, and that will put one of them over the top.
Stein: There are probably 12 or 13 teams that have legit playoff aspirations in the conference, but my fever is such that I just don't think KG, Allen and Pierce need a lot around them to get to the Finals in this East. As LeBron James just proved.
Thorpe: At this point, I like Chicago. Had Detroit not peaked against them and knocked them out, the Bulls could have made the Finals last season. That experience, along with the improved play of Tyrus Thomas and the emergence of a superstar in Deng should add up to home-court advantage throughout the Eastern playoffs and a Finals appearance.
Bucher: Seeing as every team still has the same flaws it had last season, the Cavs are the easy answer -- except that last year's red-carpet path can't possibly be duplicated. If recent history has taught us anything, it is to expect the unexpected from the East, so I'll go with my darkhorse: Toronto.
Blackman: I'll go with Toronto. Chicago will win the regular season a few games ahead of Detroit and Cleveland but Toronto is gonna be better come playoffs. Bargnani and all the other youngins are gonna be smoking hot the next season and Raptors got one of the more versatile rosters in the East.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Has the balance of power in the NBA shifted East?
Abbott: No. The teams that are a threat to win the title are still concentrated in the West. If Miami figures out a post-Shaq plan that could change things, and Chicago likely will win a title at some point. Toronto is on the right track. But whatever greatness is in Detroit and Boston now won't be around all that long, and at some point the Greg Oden and Kevin Durant effect will kick in. Not to mention, I think the biggest reason the West has been strong is that they have some well-run teams, and that's not changing.
Hollinger: Good heavens, no. Forget the Spurs, Mavs and Suns -- find me a team in the East that could even beat Utah. The best team in that conference is still a No. 7 seed out West.
Stein: Let's not start with the balance-of-power questions. The West is still best by a fair distance. But the East desperately -- desperately -- needed a player of Garnett's stature to switch conferences. Allen, Rashard Lewis, Zach Randolph ... they all help, too.
Thorpe: Not at all. The West's Final 4 from last season would all be favorites to win the East. And I'll take Portland's and Seattle's future over almost any Eastern team.
Bucher: No and No.
Blackman: Are you kidding me? The West is, and will be a zillion times better than the East at least for another 10 years. The only thing that could possibly change that in the near future is if half of the Western Conference players gets AIDS or Ebola. Even then it would be a close call.
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)
